MLA In-Text Citation Style
Version Date: November 22, 2010
The goal of the entire in-text citation and Works Cited apparatus is to provide your reader with an easy, clear way to locate the sources you have drawn upon when writing your paper. When you cite a work, your reader might think, “I’d like to read that article or look at that book.” The in-text citation provides a key to the entries in the list of Works Cited at the end of the paper, making it easy for your reader to locate the work. It is therefore crucial that each key matches the appropriate reference work. The references are alphabetized to simplify matching the citation to the work. As a last measure of quality control, then, double check to be sure that each citation in your paper clearly matches a work in the Works Cited.
Guideline 1: Basic Citation.
MLA in-text citation style has the goal of providing just enough information for the reader to be able to go directly to the location in the cited work in the bibliography. For its reference list, the MLA uses the title Works Cited.
The question of whether the readers of a literary work discover meaning or create meaning from the text has once again been raised in another recent study (Doe 298).
Note that often you will want to create boundary markers to show where your use of the source begins and where it ends. You can easily do this by using the author’s full name for the beginning marker and the page number for the ending marker. Note the difference:
Unclear where the source use begins:
It is sometimes said that we read to find ourselves there and that we read because we do not find ourselves there. Either way, readers turn to literature to find meaning. The question of whether the readers of a literary work discover meaning or create meaning from the text has once again been raised in another recent study (Doe 298).
Note that it is not clear whether all three sentences are derived from Doe, or whether only the last one is from the source. Adding a front-end boundary marker makes the borrowing clear:
It is sometimes said that we read to find ourselves there and that we read because we do not find ourselves there. Either way, readers turn to literature to find meaning. Jane Doe has recently brought up the question of whether the readers of a literary work discover meaning or create meaning from the text (298).
Guideline 2: Short quotations.
Short quotations are set off by quotation marks and cited by using the author’s name (last or first and last) and the page number.
There is a high degree of flexibility in how you include the author’s name and the page number:
the end of the novel, Wolf and Bear, the two
the end of the novel, Wolf and Bear, the two
the end of the novel, sitting “in a square of sunlight granted by a
window far above their imaginations” (Howie 437), Wolf and Bear, the
Guideline 3: Long quotations.
A quotation that would require more than four lines of your text should be in the form of a block quotation with the following features.
In her study of our literary heritage, professor Jane Doe reminds us that in many cases, we came close to not having some works at all:
Many are the tales of the discovery of unique manuscripts of what turned out to be precious works of literary greatness. Poetry used as stuffing for steamer trunks or sofas; novels hidden in the walls of a garret in some forgotten, soon-to-be-demolished building; classics, all but scraped off the parchment, accidentally discovered underneath the lesser words in a palimpsest—we do not know how lucky we are. (233-234)
1. In the research paper, the block quotation is double spaced, as is the rest of the text of the paper.
2. You should generally limit the length of block quotations to six to eight lines or so, in order to avoid losing your reader’s focus or interest. And remember, quoting at length soon looks like padding, because it usually is. If you have a spectacular long quotation, consider breaking it up and discussing it in parts.
Guideline 4: Multiple authors.
Remember that you can use the author’s full name in your introductory lead-in, or you can put the last name in the parenthetical reference. If you have multiple authors, you still have the choice.
Note the possibilities:
John Doe and Jane Smith remark that, while the battle would normally have been fought at sunup, “Clouds and fog in the early morning delayed the start of the carnage until nearly noon” (567).
According to the account given in The Fog of War—And Other Weather Problems, the battle that would normally have begun at dawn was delayed by “clouds and fog in the early morning,” preventing “the start of the carnage until nearly noon” (Doe and Smith 567).
The research team offers a not-very-convincing argument that the social contract has progressed from “it’s all about you” (16th-17th century) to “it’s all about us” (18th-19th century) to “it’s all about me” (20th-21st century), alleging that pronounced narcissism is a modern—or postmodern—phenomenon (Doe et al. 443-448).
1. In this last example, you might have chosen to say, “John Doe and the others on his research team,” but it would be ineffective to say, “John Doe, Jane Smith, Tom Brown, Ellen Jones, Fred Roe, and Alison Johnson offer” as your lead-in. Similarly, listing even all their last names in the parenthetical reference would clutter up your paper with unnecessary information.
2. The et al. is Latin for and others. It follows the author’s last name without a comma. The et (meaning and) is a complete word, so there is no period after it. The al. is an abbreviation (for alii) so there is a period after it. The phrase is written in regular roman type (not italicized), as shown in the example above.
Guideline 5: Missing elements.
There are times when some elements of information about a source will be missing. For Web and periodical articles, an author’s name is sometimes omitted because the authorship is considered to be the organization hosting or publishing the article. For corporate authorship, include the name of the organization.
When the polishing error was discovered, the Hubble mirror was described as “needing glasses” (NASA 234).
The award is based on the results of Web-based surveys, limiting the survey sample to those who have Internet access (Doe).
New studies have concluded that Americans are getting an insufficient amount of Vitamin D, in part because of too little time spent outdoors (“New Research”).